Keeping tags on dogs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Every dog should have a microchip inserted in the scruff of its neck, speakers will argue today at a conference in Stansted, Essex, devoted to electronic identification of pets, writes Nicholas Schoon.
The tiny devices, the size of a grain of rice, remain in the animal for life. Another device, the reader, detects the unique number in each chip from outside the dog's body.
In Britain the Kennel Club keeps a database for the 250,000 dogs which have been microchipped, giving their owners' addresses.
Less than 5 per cent of UK dogs have been microchipped to date. The devices, which cost about pounds 20, are injected into the thin layer of fat just below the skin using a special syringe.
Animal welfare organisations have long argued for a compulsory, nationwide registration scheme for all dogs.This would reduce the number of bad, irresponsible owners and strays. They have failed to persuade govern- ment to legislate, except for particularly dangerous breeds like the pit bull.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments