Judge rules out pensioners' pounds 1.5bn bonus
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE WORLD'S oldest life assurance company, Equitable Life, was saved a pounds 1.5bn bill yesterday when a judge ruled that it was not legally bound to pay bonuses to 90,000 "guaranteed" pension policyholders.
The High Court ruling by the Vice-Chancellor, Sir Richard Scott - open to appeal - will see the policyholders receive up to 25 per cent less income for retirement than they expected. The ruling has repercussions throughout the pensions sector.
Sir Richard rejected claims that the decision to cut bonuses involved "depriving policyholders of part of their asset share". He said the directors were acting well within the discretion allowed by the contracts that were sold.
The case was brought in the High Court by Equitable to try to silence a storm of criticism about its handling of so-called guaranteed annuities. These were widely sold in the Seventies and Eighties, but had become prohibitively expensive to service because of a fall in investment returns in the past five years.
Alan Nash, Equitable managing director, said he was "delighted" the court had vindicated the directors' decision to cut bonuses rather than land 400,000 remaining with-profits policyholders with the bill.
However, David Hyman, a semi-retired former stockbroker, of Hampstead Garden Suburb, north London, who had agreed to be the defendant, said after the judgment that he was "disappointed" but "not surprised" by the ruling. He said he had bought five policies from Equitable in the belief they were the best. "Far from the policies being better than those of anyone else, it turns out they were far behind the pile," he said. Another Equitable pensioner said he had seen the value of his retirement pot fall from pounds 450,000 to pounds 290,000 because of the policy change.
Industry experts were divided on the precise figures involved, although one estimate suggested that the total bill for the industry had the case gone against the Equitable would have been about pounds 10bn.
The only other company known to face problems on a similar scale is Scottish Widows, which has set aside pounds 1.7bn.
Equitable still faces the threat of another legal challenge from 500 policyholders.
Test case, Business, page 20
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments