Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

JPs inconsistent on bail decisions erratic

Glenda Cooper
Thursday 17 December 1998 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

MAGISTRATES ARE frequently inconsistent when making decisions about bail, yet are highly confident that they have made the correct decision.

In a study of more than 80 magistrates, only one-third were consistent when presented with the same case twice, according to research by Dr Mandeep Dhami, a psychologist at City University, London.

Dr Dhami told the British Psychological Society's conference in London that magistrates from 44 courts were given a set of 27 hypothetical cases and asked to make decisions over bail for offences ranging from shoplifting, theft and grievous bodily harm. They were also sent duplicates of seven cases where only the name was changed.

More than two-thirds showed inconsistency in at least one if not more of the cases, and the extent of their experience made no difference.

Men tended to be treated more punitively than women, and magistrates were more likely to be severe if told the police viewed the suspect with hostility or the prosecution argued for harsh treatment.

Dr Dhami said the law needed to be made clearer. "Lay magistrates only work 35 half- days a year. It is very difficult for them to develop consistency," she said. "We need reform and stricter guidelines so that they know on what basis to make decisions."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in