Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Jowell warned on gene patenting

Roger Dobson,Charles Arthur
Thursday 27 November 1997 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Tessa Jowell, the public health minister, has been warned by leading British geneticists that the Government's policy on gene patenting could cost the National Health Service millions of pounds - mostly payable in royalties to American and Canadian biotechnology companies.

The Council of Ministers meets today in Brussels to discuss the proposed European directive on biotechnology patenting. Nobody is yet sure whether the directive would allow companies to claim rights to individual human genes, rather than insisting that they must patent a new technique - such as a test using the gene. The US already allows companies to patent the DNA sequence of a gene - including human genes - outright.

The British government backs the directive as it stands. But Professor Andrew Read, chairman of the British Society for Human Genetics, says that Ms Jowell got it wrong when she said the directive would make little difference.

"I believe there are significant implications for the NHS and there is a need for strategic planning to cope with the predictable changes and avoid the risk of scandal," he said in a letter to the minister.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in