Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Journals fight scientific fraud

RESEARCH

Jeremy Laurance
Thursday 24 July 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The editors of nine medical journals, including the British Medical Journal and The Lancet, have joined forces to combat scientific fraud. The nine editors have set up a Committee on Publication Ethics to share information and monitor misconduct after one editor experienced four cases of fraud in his first year.

Britain's only private agency for investigating medical fraud has reported 17 cases to the General Medical Council since 1989, all of which have resulted in convictions for serious professional misconduct. Another 12 cases are pending.

In a case settled last week, Dr John Anderton, a former secretary of the Royal College of Physicians in Edinburgh was struck off the medical register by the GMC for faking data in a clinical trial.

Last May, Dr Peter Nixon, a consultant cardiologist from Charing Cross Hospital, admitted in court that errors in scientific papers cowritten by him appeared to be "more than an honest slip of the pen." A libel action he was fighting against a television company collapsed and the Medical Defence Union, which had supported him, was left facing a bill of pounds 2 million.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in