Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Investors aim to recover pounds 10m

Friday 12 January 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

An international accountancy organisation is contesting a High Court claim that it is liable for a multi-million pound fraud perpetrated by a former executive director, the confidence trickster Nicholas Young.

Young, son of a chaplain to the Queen, served a prison sentence for swindling investors by betting with their money instead of putting it into the high-yielding offshore fund he had promised.

Yesterday, 120 investors began an action to recover pounds 10m gambled away by Young while he was a senior executive of Clark Kenneth Leventhal.

The investors claim Young's employers facilitated the fraud by placing him in a "respectable" position and failing adequately to supervise his dealings with third parties.

The claim is based on argument that Young acted as agent for the defendants who received money through that agency; that the defendants are vicariously liable for his fraud, and that they are liable in negligence.

In a hearing expected to last up to 15 weeks, CKL and two of its members at the time of the fraud - Clark Whitehill, sued as representing itself and other member firms, and Swedish accountants Bangstad Revisionsbyra AB - deny all liability for Young's dishonest activities.

Alan Newman QC told Mr Justice Dyson that, without the position he occupied as international executive officer of a prestigious group of accountancy practices, Young could not have carried conviction.

"Without it, he could not have convinced others he had access to offshore investments and favourable tax treatment," said Mr Newman.

He operated with apparent openness for over 12 years "with the appearance of the knowledge and support of CKL and Clark Whitehill and with the seal of authenticity this gave him", said Mr Newman.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in