Inspectors will police state care homes
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.INSPECTORS ARE to be authorised to check on standards of care in state homes for young people and the elderly, and will have powers to close homes, according to tough new guidelines published by the Government today.
In a White Paper on social services, the Government is proposing to introduce regional commissions to take over the inspection of homes from local authorities. These commissions will enforce standards of care in all residential homes.
The Government's proposed measures are intended to address continued failure to detect cruelty in care homes.
The new standards come after three people were charged over allegations of neglect at an Essex care home for children and vulnerable adults. The man and two women, who have been bailed to appear before Chelmsford magistrates in March, were among five people arrested last week as part of an inquiry at the Old Convent, Bicknacre, near Chelmsford.
To coincide with today's White Paper, the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children has released a report accusing child protection agencies of failing children in their care because of poor communication.
According to the NSPCC, most cases of organised child abuse are only uncovered by accident because not enough information is shared by those whose job it is to protect children.
The charity is calling for changes in the way paedophile rings are investigated. The NSPCC guide calls for the introduction of specialist intelligence gathering techniques and joint investigations. Looking at 20 cases involving paedophile rings in London, it found that many investigations were only initiated after chance sharing of crucial long-standing information by different agencies, disclosure by an abuse victim apprehended while committing a non-sexual offence or a complaint made by one abuser against another.
Meanwhile, a high proportion of investigations over months and sometimes years failed to lead to the conviction of abusers. Very few were triggered by a straightforward report from a victim or witness. And it was not uncommon for related information to be stored in different files.
Cases with multiple victims showed that peer group pressure - fuelled by fear of retribution - deterred children from exposing their abusers. If family members were involved, victims expressed guilt at having their relatives imprisoned and arrested. Paedophiles helped each other by intimidating witnesses or destroying corroborative evidence.
Organised abusers also targeted ethnic minority families with a poor grasp of English to reduce the chance of discovery.
The NSPCC recommends that there should be systematic sharing of information on all reported child sexual abuse cases and investigations should be run jointly by the police, social services and the charity.
Jim Harding, director of the the NSPCC, said: "We all need guidance on this pressing issue. We have to provide a more organised response to organised abuse."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments