India gags the Queen
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Queen yesterday cancelled a planned speech in Madras, southern Indian, after the hosts refused to let her speak at a state governor's banquet.
The speech scheduled for today had not been included in the initial programmes discussed by British officials with Indian diplomats. It was raised in a meeting on 7 October, five days before the Queen's arrival, when it was firmly turned down by Indian protocol officials.
"Only one banquet speech is scheduled for a visiting head of state, which is normally given at the banquet hosted by our president," the Indian Foreign Ministry said.
A ministry spokesman, Talmiz Ahmed, said it was not a last-minute cancellation, as was being portrayed by British diplomats.
While the Indians used unusually direct language, the British tried to play down the latest in a series of controversies, calling it a slight misunderstanding. "We are taking no offence," Judith Slater, a government spokeswoman, said.
"If the Indian preference is no exchange of toast in Madras, there is absolutely no problem," Ms Slater said, adding that Buckingham Palace had known of the opposition to the speech, but the Foreign Office had not.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments