Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

i Editor's Letter: This week's "big idea"

 

Stefano Hatfield
Friday 24 February 2012 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Curious word: think-tank; makes one wonder at its etymology.

Joe Gunner sitting in his turret might not have too much thinking time other than: "get him, before he gets me!" Not much better thinking takes place in a think-tank than a Challenger tank, is your withering response to the Social Market Foundation's "big idea" this week.

We'll ignore for a moment the £2.4bn the SMF suggests could be saved through means-testing child benefit; let's gloss over the £1bn it claims could be saved by banning people from having more than £15,000 in tax-free ISAs – a horribly cruel idea. Instead, we'll focus on bus passes. The SMF has "think-tanked" that pensioners should lose the right to free bus passes as the £1bn cost of the scheme "does nothing to help the economy". Their words.

You do not need to be old to see what a bonkers explanation that is – even if you had sympathy with the idea itself on the grounds that not all over-60s are poor.

The elderly would be left virtual prisoners at home if the scheme were axed. A single cash fare on a London bus is £2.30 (£4.60 return) – in rural areas where the distances are longer, it is a lot more than this. It is a financial non-starter.

This makes a huge difference to those using that bus pass to go shopping, or to the cinema, or the pub or a Starbucks, and spending money – let alone those who need to get to a doctor. Has the SMF not heard of the Silver Economy? Not read about ageing populations? This is not even to mention safety aspects of keeping some elderly would-be drivers off-road. We are not even discussing the issues that the resulting lack of mobility would cause in the realm of health and depression.

I have a bigger problem with the think-tank's so-called ideas. They are so entirely out of touch with so many people's present reality and society's future needs that I question the point of publishing them – other than to scare us all. This time, I don't need to ask what you think. See you tomorrow.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in