Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Howard's leadership hopes are hit again

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A third former Home Office minister yesterday took a sideswipe at Michael Howard, the former Home Secretary, in a fresh blow to his Conservative leadership campaign.

Charles Wardle told the Commons that when he had been the minister responsible for immigration, he had been instructed to turn a blind eye to a damning DTI inspectors' report on the Al Fayed brothers' take-over of the London store Harrods in order to take a more favourable view of their appeal for British citizenship.

Mr Wardle said he was pressed to reverse a decision by the immigration section of the Home Office which rejected the application by the Al Fayeds.

He later concluded the Al Fayeds had been "stitched up" by the DTI inspectors' report into their take-over of the House of Fraser, but to ignore the report would have been unlawful, compromised the highest standards of the civil servants in the immigration section of the Home Office and would have led to abuses of immigration rules.

Mr Wardle did not name Mr Howard, but it is likely to have inflicted further damage on his campaign for the Tory leadership following criticism from two subordinates. Peter Lloyd and Ann Widdecombe said there was "something of the night" about Mr Howard. He was Mr Wardle's boss at the time, and was at the DTI at the height of the Guinness case.

Mr Wardle focused on his long-standing demands for a shake-up in DTI investigations, alleging ministerial pressure to capture "scalps" including Lord Spens, a merchant banker, with the Guinness take-over inquiry in the run-up to the 1987 general election, and the investigation into House of Fraser.

"My objective is to put right what I consider to be wrongs. Persistent press inquiries have related to the Conservative leadership contest. I have related time and again to journalists that I was seeking the debate months before the leadership contest was contemplated," he said.

"Having looked back at the vitriolic and unscrupulous warfare between Tiny Rowland and Mohammed al Fayed, I have come to the fairly dramatic conclusion that the Al Fayeds were stitched up by a DTI inquiry."

In a reference to the "sleaze" row in which Mr Al Fayed alleged he had paid some Conservative MPs in pounds 5 notes stuffed into envelopes, Mr Wardle added: "I can understand the general distaste for their unprincipled and unsavoury use of brown envelopes and other inducements ... And yet injustice is injustice."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in