Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Homes auditor challenged

Steve Boggan
Wednesday 22 February 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Conservatives on Westminster City Council have called for urgent clarification of councillors' legal responsibilities following the conclusion early this month of the "homes-for-votes" inquiry, writes Steve Boggan.

In a letter to the Independent today, the Conservative group challenges the decision of John Magill, the Westminster District Auditor, publicly to attack its housing policy even though it was carried out on legal advice. They have been prevented from speaking publicly until now by a silencing order under the Local Government Act. Nine of their colleagues, including Dame Shirley Porter, could face surcharges of millions of pounds for allegedly initiating a housing policy that favoured potential Tory voters.

The group will today hand in a letter to Mr Magill's office asking him to clarify their potential culpability when taking decisions approved by legal officials.

Simon Milton, deputy leader of the council, said last night: "If we ensure all our decisions are approved legally, yet an unelected arbiter can come along years later and surcharge or disqualify us, then there is something very wrong with our system of democracy."

Letters, page 18

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in