Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Hoffmann given boost by Lord Irvine

Ian Burrell Home Affairs Correspondent
Tuesday 09 February 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE LORD Chancellor said yesterday that Lord Hoffmann should not be made to stand down for his "error of judgment" in the Pinochet case.

Speaking publicly for the first time about the law lord's role in the case, Lord Irvine of Lairg said he believed such an error was unlikely to happen again "in a hundred years".

He said Lord Hoffmann, whose failure to declare his links to Amnesty International led to an appeal judgment by the Law Lords being set aside, was too good a lawyer to be lost to the system.

The Lord Chancellor's comments will come as a great relief to Lord Hoffmann whose career was hanging in the balance after five of his fellow law lords criticised his lack of judgment in the appeal of former Chilean leader General Augusto Pinochet against his extradition to Spain. A new panel of seven law lords is re-considering the appeal.

Lord Irvine said: "There is no doubt that the standing of the system has taken a bit of a knock because the House of Lords had to set aside a previous decision of itself and start again."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in