Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Hindley to reject EU appeal on freedom ruling

Steve Boggan
Friday 24 January 1997 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

While the moors murderer Myra Hindley waited to learn her fate yesterday, her lawyers denied they would turn to the European Court of Human Rights if, as expected, Michael Howard decides that she will never be freed.

The lawyers were responding to reports that the Home Secretary will announce her fate next week, even though Hindley's legal team had been assured that no decision had yet been taken by Mr Howard and that the relevant papers were still with Ann Widdecombe, the prisons minister.

The Independent reported in December 1994 that a decision had been taken never to release Hindley. The result of her appeal to the Home Secretary against that decision is widely expected within days.

Yesterday, the Daily Mail reported that the decision had already been made and would precipitate a rush to the European courts. But Hindley's solicitors, London-based Taylor Nichol, said: "The representations against the whole [life] tariff submitted to Michael Howard were based entirely on the principles of English law. Any challenge to his decision will also be based on principles of English law.

There was a feeling among those who campaign for Hindley's freedom that the leak was politically motivated, to make Mr Howard appear tough on crime and on Europe.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in