Heseltine to hack again at red tape
Ministers to report monthly on any plans for new rules
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Government's war against Whitehall red tape is to be "stepped up" for at least the tenth time since the last election, as it emerged yesterday that ministers are to be ordered to present a monthly report to Michael Heseltine, the Deputy Prime Minister, on any planned new regulations.
Mr Heseltine was charged by the Prime Minister with "hacking back the jungle of red tape" in 1992, when he was President of the Board of Trade. Since then the Government's deregulation unit, for which he retains responsibility as John Major's deputy, has identified 1,000 regulations for abolition.
But right-wingers point out that the Government creates about 1,400 statutory instruments - rules which do not need parliamentary approval - every year. Hence the requirement, from 1 January, for a monthly report justifying new statutory instruments to be submitted to Mr Heseltine or his deputy, Roger Freeman, the public services minister.
Mr Heseltine's Cabinet committee on domestic policy has also ordered ministers to stop "gold-plating" European directives - when departments make regulations that are more restrictive than required to satisfy European law. Ministers are believed to have criticised draft Home Office fire regulations which were felt to go further than EU safety law.
The renewed initiative against red tape follows a seminar earlier this month at Chevening, Kent, the Foreign Secretary's residence, reported in yesterday's Financial Times. The meeting is said to have identified four areas where red tape could be cut: health and safety, food hygiene, building regulations and taxpaying.
However, the Labour Party yesterday was scornful of the plan. "Declaring war on red tape is one of those things Tory ministers always do when they are in need of an applause injection," said a Labour spokesman. He pointed to recent analysis which showed that 71 per cent of the regulations now in force had been introduced since the Conservatives were elected in 1979.
The first high-profile drive against red tape was the review by the Marks & Spencer boss, Sir Derek Rayner, in 1982. Lord Young of Graffham, then a Cabinet minister, promised to create jobs by cutting regulations affecting small businesses, and legislation followed.
Mr Major again promised to "simplify rules and regulations" in his 1992 election manifesto.
Since then, however, the tide has showed little sign of turning. A year later, small businesses reported a "significant" increase in red tape, with the Government and the European Commission held to be equally responsible.
The crusade also suffered a setback when the trade minister responsible, the right-winger Neil Hamilton, was forced to resign in October last year over "cash for questions" row.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments