Hedge gets chop in feud that divided neighbours for 18 years
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An 18-year battle over a garden hedge took a decisive turn yesterday when one of the combatants was given the go-ahead to lop nearly 20ft off its height.
The hedge - a row of 10 Leylandii fir trees - in the Bourn- ville area of Birmingham, had grown to a height of 30 ft, and Michael Jones, 67, and his wife, Maureen, have been complaining for years that it was blocking their light.
The trees belong to the Jones's neighbour, 88-year-old Charles Stanton, but despite a succession of court cases estimated to cost around pounds 100,000, he has refused to allow them to be pruned.
Yesterday Mr Stanton remained behind locked doors. A cardboard coffin was placed outside his home with the epitaph: "RIP My Lovely Trees, whose gentle green mantle has so nobly softened my gaze against the ugly reality beyond."
Mr Stanton planted the hedge in 1971 as soon as the Joneses moved in. Trouble flared in 1978 when Mr Jones claimed the hedge was too tall at 20 ft and blocked his light.
Following three court cases, including one at the High Court in London, a Birmingham County Court judge ruled Mr Jones could prune the trees to open "reasonable" height. Mr Stanton was ordered to pay costs of up to pounds 70,000, but he has vowed to continue fighting.
In the course of the battle, Mr Stanton's son, Paul, has been convicted of assaulting Mr Jones, papers on the case fill three bulging files and the wrangle has even been debated on Gardeners' Question Time.
The row also made history when a court was obliged to deliver a legal definition of a hedge: "A number of woody plants, whether capable of growing into trees or not, which are so planted after being tended together as to form both screen and barrier."
Mrs Jones said as the trees were lopped: "I'm obviously overjoyed. It's just beyond my comprehension how can anybody be so nasty as to want to stop someone seeing the blue sky and winter sun."
The Jones's problems may not be over, however. Mr Jones explained:"Beyond this hedge we have the problem of a second hedge of trees. In three years' time I know this second hedge will be a nuisance."
The former Labour minister, Lord Howell, is backing the Jones's fight for new laws to give householders the right to control neighbours' hedges and to stop unnecessary litigation.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments