Stay up to date with notifications from TheĀ Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Wes Streeting pushes ahead with NHS puberty blockers clinical trial as high court rules ban lawful

Campaign group TransActual has lost its court challenge on the ban on puberty blockers by then-health secretary Victoria Atkins

Jabed Ahmed
Monday 29 July 2024 14:04 BST
Comments
āœ•
Close
Keira Bell discusses personal experience with puberty blockers

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Labour health secretary has said the NHS will push forward with a clinical trial to establish evidence on puberty blockers, after the High Court ruled an emergency ban on them was lawful.

On Monday, Mrs Justice Lang dismissed the challenges,Ā which had argued that an emergency ban onĀ pubertyĀ blockers made by the previous Conservative government was unlawful.

Campaign group TransActual, and a young person who cannot be named for legal reasons, made a bid to challenge the decision of then-health secretary Victoria Atkins on the medicines, which suppress the natural production of sex hormones to delayĀ puberty.

Health and social care secretary Wes Streeting welcomed the ruling, adding ā€œchildrenā€™s healthcare must be evidence ledā€.

He continued: ā€œDr Cassā€™s review found there was insufficient evidence that puberty blockers are safe and effective for children with gender dysphoria and gender incongruence.

ā€œWe must therefore act cautiously and with care when it comes to this vulnerable group of young people.

ā€œI am working with NHS England to improve childrenā€™s gender identity services, and to setting up a clinical trial to establish the evidence on puberty blockers.

ā€œI want trans people in our country to feel safe, accepted, and able to live with freedom and dignity.ā€

Wes Streeting, left, was appointed Health Secretary by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, right, when Labour took office earlier this month (PA)
Wes Streeting, left, was appointed Health Secretary by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, right, when Labour took office earlier this month (PA) (PA Wire)

The Cass Review, commissioned by NHS England and published in April, concluded that gender care is currently an area of ā€œremarkably weak evidenceā€ and young people have been caught up in a ā€œstormy social discourseā€.

Research by the University of York, carried out alongside the report, found evidence to be severely lacking on the impact of puberty blockers and hormone treatments, while the majority of clinical guidelines were found not to have followed international standards.

In her 62-page ruling, Mrs Justice Lang wrote: ā€œThis decision required a complex and multi-factored predictive assessment, involving the application of clinical judgment and the weighing of competing risks and dangers, with which the court should be slow to interfere.ā€

She added: ā€œIn my judgment, the Cass Reviewā€™s findings about the very substantial risks and very narrow benefits associated with the use of puberty blockers, and the recommendation that in future the NHS prescribing of puberty blockers to children and young people should only take place in a clinical trial, and not routinely, amounted to powerful scientific evidence in support of restrictions on the supply of puberty blockers on the grounds that they were potentially harmful.

ā€œAlthough the Cass Review did not state in terms that puberty blockers cause ā€˜a serious danger to healthā€™, that was not the question that the Cass Review was asked to consider.

ā€œThat was a matter for the defendants to determine on all the evidence before them. It would have been premature to do so before the final report had been published.ā€

Dr Hilary Cass (Yui Mok/PA)
Dr Hilary Cass (Yui Mok/PA) (PA Wire)

At a hearing on 12 July, the High Court in London heard the secondary legislation prevents the prescription of the medication by European or private prescribers and restricts NHS provision to their use within clinical trials.

Lawyers for the group and young person had argued that the order made by the previous government on 29 May was unlawful.

The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and the Department of Health in Northern Ireland defended the claim.

The emergency ban was set to last from 3 June to 3 September 2024, according to the previous Conservative government. The court heard that it might be made permanent by Labour ministers.

The ban currently applies to gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues - medicines that consist of, or contain, buserelin, gonadorelin, goserelin, leuprorelin acetate, nafarelin or triptorelin.

TransActualā€™s director for healthcare, Chay Brown, said after the decision: ā€œThis is a disappointing result. Defence evidence makes clear that they decided on an emergency ban first and sought ways to justify it second.ā€

He continued: ā€œWe are seriously concerned about the safety and welfare of young trans people in the UK.

ā€œOver the last few years, they have come to view the UK medical establishment as paying lip service to their needs; and all too happy to weaponise their very existence in pursuit of a now discredited culture war.

ā€œIt is essential that NHS England and the Department of Health and Social Care now take urgent steps to reverse this perception.ā€

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in