Face shields ‘largely ineffective at trapping small aerosols', world’s fastest supercomputer finds
Fugaku has been doing experimental work on coronavirus during pandemic
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A study by a Japanese supercomputer has reportedly suggested face shields are largely ineffective at blocking smaller respiratory droplets.
Plastic visors have been used as well as face masks during the Covid-19 pandemic, as people aim to stop the spread of coronavirus while coming into contact with others.
However, modelling in Japan has reportedly cast doubt over how effective face shields are - especially when it comes to stopping the smallest droplets from getting out into the air.
A simulation by Fugaku - which is the fatest computer ever made - found face shields did not trap nearly 100 per cent of airborne droplets less than 5 micrometres, according to The Guardian.
Riken, a Japanese research institute, claimed around half of droplets measuring 50 micrometres in size escaped, the newspaper reported.
Fugaku has been looking at Covid-19 during the pandemic, and has been simulating how the virus spreads.
Makoto Tsubokura from Riken's centre for computational science reportedly warned against using face shields as a replacement for face masks if the switch is not necessary.
“Judging from the results of the simulation, unfortunately the effectiveness of face guards in preventing droplets from spreading from an infected person’s mouth is limited compared with masks,” he told The Guardian.
“This is especially true for small droplets of less than 20 micrometres,” he said, adding: “At the same time, it somehow works for the droplets larger than 50 micrometres.”
Coronavirus mainly spreads through droplets coming from the mouth or nose, according to the World Health Organisation.
Countries have told people to wear masks in certain situations, such as on public transport or in shops, as part of efforts to control the pandemic.
Boris Johnson, the British prime minister, expanded rules over face masks in England on Tuesday, telling people they must use coverings when in taxis, and in hospitality venues when they are not eating or drinking.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments