Woman mistakenly prescribed with erectile dysfunction cream for dry eye suffers chemical injuries
Patient from Glasgow received Vitaros cream instead of VitA-POS
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A woman suffered chemical injuries after she was mistakenly prescribed erectile dysfunction cream for a severe dry eye.
The anonymous patient, from Glasgow, had to be treated in A&E after she mistakenly received Vitaros cream instead of ocular lubricant VitA-POS, a report in the BMJ Case Reports medical journal said.
She was treated with antibiotics, lubricants and steroids for her blurred vision and lid swelling.
The error has led specialists from Glasgow’s Tennent Institute of Ophthalmology to call for doctors to take greater care issuing medication.
One suggested remedy is the use of block capitals in handwritten prescriptions to avoid similar situations, the Optometry Today professional journal reports.
“Prescribing errors are common, and medications with similar names/packaging increase risk,” study lead author Dr Magdalena Edington wrote in the December BMJ report.
“However, it is unusual in this case that no individual (including the patient, general practitioner or dispensing pharmacist) questioned erectile dysfunction cream being prescribed to a female patient, with ocular application instructions.
“The patient was treated for a mild ocular chemical injury with topical antibiotics, steroids and lubricants, with good response.
“However, we believe this to be an important issue to report to enhance awareness and promote safe prescribing skills.”
Although the patient recovered from the chemical injury within a few days, she continued to suffer from recurrent corneal erosions, the Optometry Today journal reported.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments