Health targets unattainable, say GPs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Health targets introduced by the Government in 1992 are largely impossible to achieve, family doctors believe.
The survey, reported in the British Medical Journal, of more than 250 GPs found that although half had plans for meeting the targets, most thought they were unattainable. Targets for cancer were said to be the easiest to meet nationally and the reduction of suicide rate the least attainable. In their own practices, GPs listed reducing rates of heart disease and stroke as their priority target. But only a quarter believed the government's targets could be met.
The doctors said they were hampered by an excessive workload, too ambitious targets, unrealistic timescales, apathy among patients and lack of funds. They also pointed to their lack of influence over socioeconomic factors linked to health.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments