HEALTH: Hip replacements a waste of cash
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Unreliable hip replacements are not lasting long enough, causing pain and wasting money, according to the Consumers' Association. Only the oldest and cheapest models - a handful of the 60 models on the market - have been shown to last for a worthwhile length of time.
Operations to replace failed implants now made up about 11 per cent of all hip replacements in Britain, and some experts predict this figure could soon rise to 25 per cent. These "revision" operations are more complicated, more expensive and have a poorer success rate than the initial replacements, the Health Which? research found.
More than half the models on the market had been introduced since 1990, but only the oldest and cheapest implants had enough long-term evidence to support their use, it argued. However Health Which? claims the latest models made more money for manufacturers.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
0Comments