Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Health: Herbal drinks a sham, says 'Which?'

Glenda Cooper
Tuesday 08 April 1997 00:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Herbal drinks are more hype than help - if it is refreshment or revitalisation you want, you would be better off with a cup of tea or a can of cola, according to Health Which?. While health-conscious consumers are paying large amounts of money for drinks containing such things as prickly ash bark, gingko biloba and damiana, their promises to pep you up and fight off fatigue are a sham said the Consumers' Association magazine.

Rob Ashton, Health Which? managing editor, said: "Current food law is lagging behind the marketing hype - and not all the manufacturers we spoke to could back up their claims."

In a survey of 16 consumers - two groups, one of which drank herbal drinks and the other which did not - both groups identified drinks such as Purdey's, Ame and Aqua Libra as "health drinks", seeing them as "natural" and "in tune with your body". But the association says the evidence for makers' claims of refreshment and rejuvenation was "scandalously poor".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in