Hague dodges debate over Lord Archer
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.WILLIAM HAGUE yesterday attempted to distance himself from controversy surrounding Lord Archer's campaign for the post of mayor of London.
In a flurry of charge and counter-charge throughout this week, Lord Archer of Weston-super-Mare replied to a number of long-standing allegations about his colourful past - only to find that one of his alibis was shaky, and that his answers had in some cases raised more questions.
The threat posed by Lord Archer's candidacy was illustrated yesterday when questions about him took over a press conference held by the party leader before the Welsh Conservative Party conference at Llangollen.
Mr Hague told reporters that it was up to London party members to choose their candidate in the new one member, one vote process that he had introduced.
"I'm not going to endorse or to express disapproval of any of the possible Conservative candidates," Mr Hague said. "It's up to the members."
He added: "I have the confidence to say to my members: you decide."
Asked whether he was happy with Lord Archer's indication that he would stay in the race, Mr Hague replied: "I don't get involved in campaigns within the party for mayor of London. It's up to the members and it's up to the candidates to decide whether they want to be candidates."
Mr Hague's replies were taken in some quarters as a calculated snub to Lord Archer, which they were not.
But the Llangollen exchanges illustrated the difficulty and potential embarrassment that would be created if Lord Archer did decide to throw his hat into the ring.
At that point, there is no doubt that allegations about Lord Archer's past would be referred to the party's newly created Ethics and Integrity Committee, set up, in Mr Hague's own words, "so that at last the reputation of our party can be protected from those who damage it through misconduct and dishonesty".
The party could then become impaled on the same kind of difficulty the Commons Standards and Privileges Committee has faced - how can a body which is not a court of law judge allegations of "misconduct and dishonesty" without an open process of prosecution and cross-examination, and full appeal?
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments