Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Guidelines issued to grant applicants

Rhys Williams
Wednesday 25 October 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

RHYS WILLIAMS

When charities apply to the National Lottery Charities Board for grants, they are asked to bear firmly in mind the criteria that the board's assessors will use when considering awards.

According to the board's guidelines issued to applicants, assessment criteria fall into four categories - policy, potential achievements, management and long-term viability.

First, applicants are asked to consider whether their initiatives fit with the board's policy priorities. The initial round of handouts now and in December will concentrate on schemes tackling poverty. Next spring, for example, the emphasis will shift to health, disability and care charities, as well as British charities working abroad.

Board assessors will then evaluate the degree to which the charity's proposed activity: involve users and beneficiaries in its development and management, encourages community participation, and fosters self-help or improvement. The board also considers how well planned the proposal is. Applicants must demonstrate that any scheme is well-managed and financially sound, well-planned and staffed appropriately, cost-effective and good value for money, committed to equal opportunities, and able to involve volunteers effectively.

Finally, assessors may cases examine other factors which affect the long-term success of a scheme. They may, for example, consider: the presence of strategic and innovative thinking - does the activity reflect new ways of thinking about existing problems; whether there will be sustainable benefit to people or communities who participate; the potential of the activity to be seen as a pilot or model of good practice, or the likelihood of the activity continuing once funding ends.

If successful, applicants will then be monitored in two main ways. First, the board will require progress reports from organisations. Second, it will make random spot checks or request additional, detailed information to ensure that the money is being spent appropriately.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in