Greenpeace in solar 'raid' on DoE
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The environmental protest group Greenpeace yesterday attached 20 square metres of solar panels to the Department of the Environment's new central London headquarters in a dawn raid (left).
The move was intended to highlight how the Government is failing to support non-polluting solar power, which Greenpeace wants to see taking over from fossil fuels. Greenpeace said it would give the pounds 7,000 worth of panels to the Government, and also connect them to the building's electricity supply. But the Secretary of State for the Environment, John Gummer (left), said his new headquarters already had many environment-friendly features, including a pollution- and energy-saving combined heat and power system. Solar panels had been rejected by the department's experts, but his officials would discuss with Greenpeace the possibility of donating the panels to a housing charity. He congratulated the pressure group ''for keeping these issues at the top of the agenda''.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments