GPs are back on collision course with ministers over the future of their work
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.GPs are back on collision course with ministers over the future of their work. By an overwhelming majority, the annual conference of local medical committees - which represents GPs - voted to seek a new "core" contract which would exclude work already undertaken by GPs unless they were paid extra for doing it. They also insisted that GPs must be employed individually and not in groups, should not be employed by NHS Trusts and should continue to operate on a nationally agreed contract.
The decisions came despite this week's proposals from Stephen Dorrell, the Secretary of State for Health, to pave the way for more varied general practice. Family doctors, he is proposing, could be employed in a wide range of ways to suit local circumstances. He is most unlikely, however, to agree a national "core" contract, with GPs seeking to cut back on existing workload for the same pay. Nicholas Timmins
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments