Government wants to sell off half of the Royal Mail
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.JUST OVER half the Royal Mail and Parcelforce would be sold under the Government's favoured option set out yesterday in a Green Paper on postal services.
The most politically sensitive privatisation of them all would see a 51 per cent share flotation of the two Post Office businesses - but would involve three legally binding commitments: daily delivery of letters and parcels to every UK address, a 'uniform and affordable' price structure, and a nationwide network of post offices. The Queen's head would continue to appear on all stamps.
Post Office Counters, the third main Post Office business, would be retained in the public sector and allowed to diversify into new services such as bill payment.
While calculated to placate Conservative backbenchers concerned that a wholesale privatisation would threaten rural sub-post offices and lead to price rises, the package announced by Michael Heseltine, President of the Board of Trade, fell on stony ground elsewhere, with some business leaders urging a complete sell-off.
Labour pledged a summer offensive against the plan - although it made no express commitment to returning the services to the public sector. Alan Johnson, general secretary of the Union of Communication Workers, warned of job losses and a public outcry against a 'privatisation too far'.
The Institute of Directors called for a 100 per cent privatisation of both the Royal Mail and of Post Office Counters.
Michael Heron, the Post Office chairman, said: 'This shareholding partnership option is bold, imaginative and very much in tune with the public's desire to see a strong link maintained between government and Royal Mail.'
The paper, out for consultation until 30 September, includes two further options - greater commercial freedom within the public sector, or a 100 per cent share sale.
It promises that there is 'no possibility' of VAT on stamps for letters or parcels. It also proposes 'significant' investment in automation of benefit payments and other transactions.
Receipts from the flotation, possibly worth pounds 1bn, could be of some use to a Government looking for pre-election tax cuts. But ministers know they must tread carefully over a proposal that arouses strong feelings. It was rejected by Baroness Thatcher when she was Prime Minister. It has taken two years to reach the stage of a consultation paper, and is by no means certain to find its way into this autumn's Queen's Speech.
A deep Cabinet split between 'radicals' wanting more privatisation and 'consolidators' keen to avoid further controversial legislation led to the 51 per cent compromise, which key ministers including Douglas Hurd, the Foreign Secretary, eventually backed.
Details, page 2
Leading article, page 17
View from City Road, page 33
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments