Gilmour heaps scorn on press 'poodles'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.(First Edition)
ONE OF Baroness Thatcher's ministers, Lord Gilmour, last night accused her of vandalising the best television in the world and pandering to the world's worst newspapers, writes Anthony Bevins.
Calling for curbs on the tabloid press in an address at the Council for Freedom of Information's annual awards ceremony in the City of London, Lord Gilmour said many were afraid of trespassing on the sacred ground of press freedom.
But He heaped scorn on the tabloids, which displayed all the arrogance of unreformed trade unions, and he added: 'The same editors and journalists who were poodles to Lady Thatcher for 10 years now solemnly assert that any measures that are brought in to civilise the press will turn it into poodles of the Government . . . .
'Papers which toadied to a right-wing government for a decade cannot convincingly now pretend that they are really underdogs at heart.'
Urging support for Sir David Calcutt's recommendations for a privacy law and bans on trespass and telephone interception, Lord Gilmour, former editor of the Spectator, said he would also back a statutory tribunal with powers to compel publication of adjudications and corrections. But he said new curbs should be balanced by new freedoms: a statutory right of access to official information and a relaxation of libel law.
A Freedom of Information Act would improve democracy. 'But it would, of course, also help the serious segment of the press which is greatly hampered by the pervasive secrecy of British government, and it might even encourage the inferior section to pay greater attention to public issues than to private tittle-tattle.'
Freedom debate, page 5
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments