Germany's highest court annuls a decision to repurpose COVID relief funding for climate measures
Germany’s highest court has annulled a government decision to repurpose 60 billion euros ($65 billion) originally meant to cushion the fallout from the coronavirus pandemic for measures to help combat climate change and modernize the country
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Germany's highest court on Wednesday annulled a government decision to repurpose 60 billion euros ($65 billion) originally meant to cushion the fallout from the coronavirus pandemic for measures to help combat climate change and modernize the country. The ruling created a significant new problem for Chancellor Olaf Scholz's quarrelsome coalition.
The money at stake was added retrospectively to the 2021 budget in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, under rules that allow new borrowing in emergencies despite Germany's strict restrictions on running up debt.
But it eventually wasn't needed for that purpose, and the center-left Scholz's three-party coalition decided in 2022 to put the money into the “climate and transformation fund,” arguing that investment in measures to protect the climate would help the economy recover from the pandemic.
Lawmakers with the main conservative opposition bloc contended that it was a trick to get around Germany's so-called “debt brake," and 197 of them complained to the Federal Constitutional Court.
The court ruled that the government's move was unconstitutional and said it will have to find other ways of filling the resulting hole in the climate fund.
The debt brake, introduced more than a decade ago, allows new borrowing to the tune of only 0.35% of annual gross domestic product.
It can be suspended to deal with natural disasters or other emergencies that are out of the state’s control, and was for the three years after the coronavirus pandemic started in 2020 to allow for large amounts of borrowing to finance various support and stimulus packages.
Finance Minister Christian Lindner and his pro-business Free Democrats have been particularly adamant about saving money to adhere to the debt rules, and the coalition also agreed at their insistence not to raise taxes when it took office in late 2021.
Financing has been one of many sources of tension between the partners in a coalition that also includes Scholz's Social Democrats and the environmentalist Greens, and has become notorious for infighting.
The government has earmarked some 211.8 billion euros for the climate fund over the next four years. That includes money to help build up the hydrogen industry, improve railway infrastructure, support the transition to electric vehicles and renovate buildings. Its other sources of financing include revenue from emissions trading.
The managing director of environmental group Greenpeace's German branch, Martin Kaiser, said Wednesday's ruling was a “bitter setback for the protection of the climate” and criticized the government for trying to finance the climate-neutral transformation of the economy with “financial conjuring tricks.”