Genial with a popular touch
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.There is no doubt that Sir Christopher Rose, 59, was a popular choice to take over England's most senior judicial office. He had strong backing from High Court Queen's Bench division judges and the criminal Bar from the moment Lord Taylor's retirement was announced.
It is not difficult to see why. Of a relatively small number of judges who had been in the Court of Appeal long enough to be candidates for the top job, he had obvious credentials - extensive criminal justice experience and chairman of the Criminal Justice Consultative Committee. Many barristers and judges thought the appointment would be the logical step.
Like Lord Taylor, he hails from the North and had been to a grammar school, followed by Leeds and Oxford Universities and the Northern Circuit. He was also a strenuous defender of the independence of the judiciary and could be confrontational when the occasion demanded. When Michael Howard's sentencing White Paper was announced, he was one of the most outspoken critics.
His glowing reputation was dented, however, by what some saw as a touch of complacency at the Bar Council's recent annual conference, during a discussion on whether the Bar was a hostile environment to women. On the contrary, he replied, there were one or two examples, where women had been appointed when, if they had been men of comparable ability, they would not have been.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments