Geneticists lay claim to 'God's creature' Rage over creature of another God
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.TOM WILKIE
Science Editor
An unprecedented hearing on whether a living animal can be patented, making it an invention created by human ingenuity rather than a natural life form, will open in Munich tomorrow.
Religious and animal welfare groups from across Europe will try to persuade officials of the European Patent Office not to grant a patent to Harvard University. The university's scientists have genetically engineered a laboratory mouse by stitching cancer-causing genes into its DNA so the animal is predisposed to develop tumours and die of cancer. Harvard wants exclusive rights to profit from its technology by marketing the animals for medical research, and will put its case to officials of the patent office in a hearing expected to last three days.
What the university is doing "is more than playing God," according to the Rev Andrew Linzey, of Mansfield College, Oxford. "Being God means being the originator, the owner of what is created," Professor Lin-zey said, and patenting, which confers intellectual rights over a human invention, "usurps the prerogative of God" when applied to a living animal.
Malcolm Eames, of the UK Genetics Forum, warned the patent could open the way to yet more intensive factory farming with genetically engineered chickens, cows and sheep. "We regard attempts to patent animals and plants as immoral and contrary to Article 53a of the European Patent Convention [prohibiting those whose publication and exploitation would be contrary to morality or public order]." He called for a "declaration of principles outlawing patents on plants, animals, and human genetic material".
Professor Linzey added: "Genetic engineering supersedes intensive farming. The point is designing animals from embryo to the the dinner plate. If they suffer, then the genetic engineers can say, 'we'll take out the stress gene'."
Of mice and men, Section Two
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments