Garden fertiliser `waste of money'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.GARDEN FERTILISERS are a waste of money, according to a study released yesterday.
Gardening Which? magazine tested six gardens over a period of three years and concluded that those left alone did just as well as those fed with artificial fertilisers or organic manure.
The report concluded: "Sadly for the fertiliser industry, our trials have shown that, in the majority of cases, it's not worth bothering to feed your gardens at all."
Each garden tested included a lawn, bulbs, perennial plants, climbers, shrubs, strawberries, vegetables, a rose and a dwarf tree.
Only four of the gardens were fed, two with liquid and Growmore fertilisers and the other two with manure and liquid comfrey plant.
After three years the Which? gardeners found no significant differences between the gardens.
A spokeswoman said: "Plants in the fed gardens did grow slightly lusher and lawns needed cutting more often but there were no real advantages in adding extra nutrients to the soil."
Additional trials involving more than 25,000 plants and 22 different fertilisers yielded the same results.
Alistair Ayres, the editor of Gardening Which?, said: "Feeding is only worthwhile for a few greedy crops like cabbages and for plants in containers but in the majority of cases it is not worth bothering to feed gardens at all."
But John Cushnie, a frequent panelist on the BBC's Gardeners' Question Time, said: "I do agree that fertiliser is possibly overrated and that too much of it is used.
"But the report said that plants in the fed gardens were lusher and a lovely velvety green lawn is what most gardeners strive for."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments