Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Garages that fail the MoT test

Randeep Ramesh
Wednesday 06 August 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Many garages are failing to spot faults on defective cars, leaving drivers at the wheel of potentially dangerous vehicles, according to under-cover tests carried out by the Consumers' Association.

Only two of the 36 MoT test results assessed by Which?, the CA's magazine, and experts from the Department of Transport's Vehicle Inspectorate, were judged to correctly carried out.

The investigation revealed that 75 per cent of all the tests were either "poor" or "very poor", in the experts' view.

Furthermore, half the garages failed cars that should have been passed. Among the worst culprits was Quicks in Leamington Spa, a Rover franchised dealer, which missed the suspension problem on a Rover 218, but failed other suspension components that did not need replacing. The dealership added to its mistakes by quoting pounds 460 to sort out the car.

"Too many MoT testers are missing failure points they should spot," said Andrew Mcllwraith, senior editor with Which?. "This is despite a Government review of the MOT after our last inspection in 1993 revealed poor standards, overall standards are still unacceptable low." Randeep Ramesh

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in