Gang's plan to 'pop' a Picasso
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A CRIMINAL gang believed security at Christie's was so lax an insider could "pop" a Picasso into a crate and walk out with it, a court heard yesterday.
An undercover policeman said he was told the pounds 300,000 Tete de Mousquetaire would be replaced with a fake so the theft would not be discovered straight away. The officer, testifying against the former cat burglar Peter Scott, 67, told London's Snaresbrook Crown Court that in the end a plan to get hold of the painting came to nothing after it was decided it would be "too risky".
But not long afterwards he was told a more valuable Picasso, Tete de Femme, was available. The court has heard it was stolen during a raid in March last year at Lefevre Gallery, Mayfair. A deal was struck but during a "sale" at the Sherlock Holmes Hotel, police swooped and arrested Mr Scott as he allegedly walked away with pounds 70,000 "proceeds" in a carrier bag. He denies conspiring to handle stolen goods. When arrested, he insisted he was an "innocent go-between": a man he refused to identify had given him a suitcase, revealed it contained a painting, and ordered him to give it to Ronald Spring. He denied opening or looking in the case and denied taking hold of the bag of money.
But Mr Spring, 69, a former legal executive turned property dealer, who was the officer's unsuspecting contact during the undercover operation and has admitted his part in the conspiracy, has said Mr Scott was a main player in the operation.
The officer, known only as Patrick, told how he posed as a crooked dealer. "It was said that movement of paintings was done by Group 4 security but for members of staff it would just be possible to pop it into a crate and walk out with it." The case continues.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments