Gag on naming minister's son
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Government is digging itself into a legal quagmire in a bid to forestall public identification of the teenage son of the Cabinet minister at the heart of the London pub cannabis affair.
Solicitors acting for the minister and his 17-year-old son, who is said to have admitted supplying less than two grams of the drug to a Daily Mirror reporter, yesterday telephoned newspapers warning them not to print either name.
Geoffrey Bindman, a leading London solicitor, said that officials in the department of the Attorney General, John Morris, were monitoring events and that naming the youth or his parent would constitute contempt.
Downing Street is determined to invoke the provisions of the 1933 Children and Young Persons Act, which prohibits the publication of the names of juveniles under 18, to ensure that the top-level minister's name remains secret. But there is unease in Labour's ranks that the minister's identity is being kept from the public while it is known throughout the media, Westminster and the "chattering classes" in the capital.
Some MPs are also unhappy that the "fast track" punishment policy promised by Labour to bring persistent young offenders to book is now being used to hush up a political embarrassment for a Cabinet minister.
Det Chief Insp Keith Gausden, who will tomorrow take a statement from a Mirror reporter, Dawn Alford, about the alleged sale of cannabis to her by the youth for pounds 10, said yesterday the police were "under quite a degree of pressure to get this to the Crown Prosecution Service" for a decision on whether or not to prosecute the youth.
Paul Flynn, Labour MP for Newport West, said last night: "The minister's son ... must be treated in exactly the same way as anyone else." Putting him on the fast track "could be interpreted as preferential treatment to protect the minister", he said.
"Fast track law for juveniles was intended to get troublemakers off the streets, not to avoid embarrassment to ministers ... Certain Cabinet ministers have been sanctimonious and censorious in denouncing those who sell recreational drugs and have insisted that the parents must share the blame. The minister concerned could be open to the accusation of saying one thing and doing another."
The Home Secretary, Jack Straw, has turned down a formal approach for an interview from the Independent on Sunday.
A Labour MP, Charles Clark, last night admitted he had taken drugs "a couple of times in my late teens" but said he had never bought or traded in them and was opposed to the legalisation of cannabis.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments