Funding of Blair's office to be investigated by MPs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The secret funding of Tony Blair's office is to be investigated by a committee of MPs after complaints about the propriety of a "blind fund" to help him pay for his campaigns.
The Commons Standards and Privileges Committee, whose last report resulted in the resignation of the Paymaster General, David Willetts, is to examine the funding of the Opposition leader's office and in particular the fund set up two years ago as a vehicle for anonymous donations to the party.
The investigation will embarrass Labour, which has sought to make the secretive nature of Tory funding an issue. The embarrassment could be compounded should Mr Blair, like Mr Willetts, face questioning by the committee in the glare of television cameras.
The investigation follows a complaint by the Tory MP for Dover, David Shaw, following revelations last year of the existence of the blind fund. Sir Gordon Downey, Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, has given provisional approval to the concept of the blind fund. Because of this he has told members of the Committee he cannot undertake an investigation into the fund himself.
The idea was to allow donors to Labour privately to give large sums. But many in the party believe it was an "own goal", as the party argues it is more open about its sources of funding than the Tories.
In his complaint Mr Shaw said the notion of such a blind fund is a sham, as "it is inconceivable that a donor would not seek to draw the receiving MPs' attention to his donation at some time".
The Standards and Privileges Committee will also examine the role of former Tory whip Andrew Mitchell in the investigation into the Neil Hamilton cash-for-questions affair. It has decided to call Mr Mitchell to give evidence next Monday.
Major wins first test, page 6
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments