Frustrated judge seeks rethink on verdicts
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A judge called yesterday for a Scottish-style "not proven" verdict for England and Wales after a jury failed to reach verdicts for a second time on theft charges against a former Salvation Army financial adviser.
Judge Gerald Butler QC said no fault should be attached to the jury at Southwark Crown Court for failing to come to a decision as he formally ordered that Stuart Ford, of Halifax, West Yorkshire, be found not guilty on all counts.
But the judge told the court he regretted that the option of returning a not proven verdict, as in the Scottish legal system, was not available.
Because this was the second time a jury has split, the Crown Prosecution Service will not pursue another criminal trial, although the Salvation Army has already successfully sued Mr Ford and others in a High Court action in 1995 for the loss of a total of pounds 6.6m from its funds in 1992.
Mr Ford was found to be personally liable for about pounds 2m and the Court of Appeal later rejected his challenge against the ruling.
The not proven verdict is a half-way house between discharging the heavy burden of proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt and an acquittal.
The judge said: "My duty is to enter verdicts of not guilty on these counts.
"It does occur to me we might learn something from the Scottish jurisdiction. This is not the first time a second jury has failed to agree in a case with which I am concerned.
"In the Scottish jurisdiction the judge asked the jury if they find the defendant guilty or not guilty or if the case against him is not proven.
"If we had a not proven verdict here it might assist in a case of this kind.
Major Peter Smith, the Salvation Army's Legal and Parliamentary Secretary, said: "I am pleased to say donations have remained at strong levels in recent years, despite some misinformed comments concerning the circumstances of the original loss in 1992.
"Our supporters have clearly realised that the Army was a victim of fraud and their confidence was rewarded when we announced the full recovery of all lost money."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments