Fresh evidence for life on Mars
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Evidence that Mars once fostered life, at least in microbial form, is supported by two papers published in the journal Science today. The findings are likely to spark intense debate in Houston, Texas, next week, when an international gathering of geochemists and biologists have set aside two days of a week-long conference programme solely to debate results from examination of samples from the meteorite ALH84001.
The first paper, by a team from the California Institute of Technology, found that magnetic grains inside the meteorite cooled in the presence of a strong magnetic field on Mars about 4 billion years ago, but were not reheated. This would back up the theory put forward last August by Nasa scientists, who suggested that carbonaceous deposits were formed by living organisms, rather than high-temperature reactions.
The second paper, which examines the ratios of carbon isotopes within the carbonate deposits, also suggests they were formed at low temperatures. "Everything we see is consistent with biological activity," said John Valley, a geochemist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. "Though I still wouldn't rule out low-temperature inorganic processes. We have not proven that this represents life on Mars, but we have disproven the high- temperature hypothesis." Charles Arthur
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments