Found: the lost avenue of Avebury stones
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ONE OF the greatest archeological discoveries of the century, a lost "avenue" of slabs linked to the world's largest prehistoric stone circle, has been unearthed at Avebury in Wiltshire.
The discovery of this second avenue of sarsen (large grey stones) solves a neolithic puzzle that has confounded historians and archaeologists for nearly three centuries. Until a mechanical digger struck the top of the first stone to be revealed amid the chalk and clay soil of a farmer's field last week, the only known pre- historic stone avenue in the area was that leading to nearby West Kennet.
The discovery of the parallel pairs of megaliths, linking the Beckhampton long barrow, just south-west of Avebury, with the henge itself, settles a controversy that has excited academics since the beginning of the 18th century.
A Lincolnshire antiquarian, William Stukeley, said in the 1720s that a second line of stones might exist. He argued that what he dubbed "the Beckhampton Avenue" had a pivotal role in the ceremonial activities and spiritual beliefs of the people who erected and visited the ancient monuments in and around the village of Avebury.
His theory was based on years of field observation and the examination of classical and historical texts. In 1743, he published his conclusions in Abury: a Temple of the British Druids. (Abury was then the village's name.) Stukeley's ideas were dismissed by many at the time and since as mere guesswork, lacking any firm basis. A 15-strong team from Southampton, Leicester and Newport, Wales, universities drew a blank last year when they excavated the same field to test Stukeley's notions about Avebury's "missing link".
Joshua Pollard, a co-director of the excavation, said that their discovery this summer "forces us to rethink the whole nature of the Avebury complex".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments