Five years on, the news from Rio is failure
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Five years ago today the United Nation's Rio Earth Summit opened in Rio de Janeiro. At the time it looked like a historic event; the largest gathering ever of prime ministers and presidents, held to address a gathering environmental crisis which had been the subject of intensive debate and research for more than two decades.
More than 70 presidents and prime ministers have pledged to attend a follow-up event in New York, Earth Summit plus Five, later this month.
But it looks like being as empty an event as the 1992 meeting in Brazil - another long text to be negotiated which no one reads and is soon forgotten, stirring speeches, empty agreements. For the record, the UN Conference on Environment and Development (its official name) is largely one of failure.
The developed countries, with the exception of the United States, pledged to strive to increase their aid to the Third World; it has fallen sharply since. They said that by 2000 they would stabilise their rising emissions of climate-changing greenhouse gases; it now looks certain that the great majority will fail to keep that commitment, with Britain and Germany the two major exceptions.
For at least a quarter of a century, it has been convincingly argued that humanity is on a road to disaster because it is failing to take a long-term view of its crucial relations with nature and natural resources.
It is not the end of the world which is looming, but a series of interconnected crises - climate change, lack of fresh water and fertile soil, collapsing fish stocks - in the first few decades of the next century. Unless action is taken now, the costs of adapting to this degraded world will be colossal, and the toll will be measured in ill health, early deaths and insecurity as well as in money. The harm mounts as each year of inaction passes.
Since 1992 there has been strong economic growth globally, partly from huge increases in international trade and private-sector investment flowing from rich countries to poor. So development is taking place: by and large people around the planet are living longer, enjoying better health, seeing living standards rise. And while much of that prosperity does more environmental damage, it also provides societies with the resources to tackle the problems - if they chose to.
But the gap between rich and poor is widening, within countries and between them. The planet could do with a real Earth Summit, when world leaders really do make history and change course towards sustainability. But at the moment, New York seems more likely to consist of mere words and a group photograph.
Troubled planet, page 6
Letters, page 17
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments