Firms' genetic tests on staff should be illegal, say experts
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE GOVERNMENT should act to stop employers from genetically testing their staff to predict their future health, an advisory commission said yesterday.
Such tests - which are currently legal and not subject to legislation - might otherwise become a routine way to estimate workers' future absenteeism, it warned.
A study by the Human Genetics Advisory Commission found only one employer which uses genetic tests now, but the practice may become more widespread as the tests become cheaper.
"We have heard expert opinion that genetic testing may become relevant to employment in the future, although it is difficult to predict the time scale," says the commission's report.
Scientists are on the verge of unravelling the entire genetic makeup of mankind as part of the international Human Genome Project, which is leading to the development of a new generation of genetic tests.
In future, employers might try to assess workers' likely illnesses based on a genetic analysis, making the tests a valuable tool for assessing future labour costs.
"Unfair discrimination might arise if employers use genetic test results for employee selection," the report says, concluding that "it would not be acceptable for genetic test results to be used to exclude people from employment or advancement on the grounds that they have a predisposition to future ill health."
The Ministry of Defence is the only employer now using genetic tests - to assess pilots for sickle-cell anaemia, an inherited condition linked with black-outs during depressurisation.
Baroness O'Neill, the acting chair of the commission, said employers would only be justified in insisting on a genetic test if an inherited disorder might pose a risk to others. Train drivers, for instance, are already checked for colour blindness - a genetic trait - though with a conventional test. But other dangerous conditions could only be found by genetic testing.
The commission recommends that for jobs where public safety issues arise, an employer should have the right not to employ someone who refuses a genetic test.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments