Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Final act in Bridgewater saga begins

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The men jailed in 1979 for the murder of newspaper boy Carl Bridgewater finally get their day in court today when a hearing of extensive new evidence begins at the Court of Appeal.

The appeal, expected to last up to four weeks, is the last leg of an 18-year campaign to get the convictions of cousins Vincent and Michael Hickey, James Robinson and the late Patrick Molloy overturned.

In a sensational turn of events in February, the Court of Appeal freed the Hickeys and Mr Robinson on unconditional bail after an independent forensic test, completed just a fortnight earlier, revealed that police had concocted a statement used to provoke Mr Molloy into making a false confession.

While the final appeal hearing will involve less drama, lawyers for the men plan to expose each and every failure that contributed to the miscarriage of justice. Evidence relating to around 80 further grounds of appeal will be presented, covering the men's alibis, the unreliability of prosecution witnesses and non-disclosure of forensic evidence.

Jim Nichol, their solicitor, said: "If the evidence we have today had been heard at the original trial these men would never have gone to prison. The failure to disclose relevant material ... has helped to keep them behind bars. Much of what we now have was available at the time of the trial."

Ann Whelan, mother of Michael Hickey and a key figure in the campaign to prove the men's innocence, said: "We have waited for this day for nearly 19 years and it is my fervent hope that when the men are finally shown to be innocent, the establishment will have the courage to say 'sorry' ...

"Not only have the men been badly led down by the system, but the Bridgewater family, who suffered a terrible loss, are now faced with the knowledge that the real killer has never been brought to justice."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in