Film director fights blasphemy ban
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
The author Salman Rushdie yesterday defended Nigel Wingrove's right to freedom of expression as the film director began his fight against Britain's blasphemy law in the European Court of Human Rights.
In a written submission Mr Rushdie, who successfully defended his novel The Satanic Verses against charges of blasphemy before a British court in 1989, said: "Freedom of religious belief is as important a concept as freedom of speech ... But while it is surely proper that our laws should protect people's right to believe in whatever they may choose, it is just as surely wrong to privilege the beliefs ... by protecting them against dissent, satire and disbelief."
Geoffrey Robertson QC argued for Mr Wingrove that banning his film Visions of Ecstasy, about St Teresa of Avila's visions of Christ, breached his freedom of expression guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights. The film was refused a certificate by the British Board of Film Classification.
A judgment is expected in the summer.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments