Fertility laws `must be stricter'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE LAW governing the use of human sperm and eggs should be tightened so that the Diane Blood case, where a woman became pregnant with her dead husband's sperm, could not happen again, a new report to the Department of Health recommends.
The report says that consent must be gained in writing before removal of any gametes; the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) should no longer be able to permit export of sex cells that have been removed unlawfully; and the courts should determine the legality of cases.
The report is part of a review of consent procedures conducted by Sheila McLean, Professor of Law and Ethics in Medicine at the University of Glasgow. It was ordered by the previous government.
Mrs Blood is due to give birth in the new year. Her husband, Stephen, died four years ago.
The HFEA blocked Mrs Blood's attempts to have a baby in Britain using sperm taken from her husband on the basis that he had not given written consent. Mrs Blood applied for a judicial review when the HFEA also refused her permission to receive treatment in Belgium. The decision went against her, but the Appeal Court ruled that the HFEA had been wrong not to abide by European law which gives citizens the right to go to another member state for treatment. The HFEA reversed its decision.
Professor McLean recommends the requirement in the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 for consent to be given in writing should remain, and be extended to all treatment provided under the Act. A possible exception could be when someone cannot give consent because they are ill, although expected to recover, and are facing treatment that could render them infertile.
Tessa Jowell, minister for Public Health, said yesterdaypublic and professional views on the recommendations would be sought by April.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments