Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Fayed fumes over passport decision

Ian Burrell
Thursday 06 May 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

JACK STRAW yesterday rejected Mohamed Al Fayed's application for British citizenship after expressing doubts about the "good character" of the Egyptian-born Harrods owner.

The Home Secretary based his decision on concern over Mr Fayed's role in the "cash for questions" affair, in which he admitted making payments to MPs, and over a break-in to a Harrods safe deposit box belonging to his former business rival, Tiny Rowland. Mr Fayed described the decision as "perverse" and said he would mount a legal challenge. He said he was a victim of the British establishment and "zombie" politicians. He was particularly annoyed that on Wednesday night he shook hands with Tony Blair and Mr Straw at a conference of the Muslim Council of Britain.

In March, the Home Office asked Mr Fayed - who has lived in Britain since the 1960s - for a written submission in respect of the cash-for- questions and safe deposit box issues. Mr Fayed forwarded a 52-page defence of his actions but Mr Straw was unconvinced.

Mr Fayed said the decision was "unfair and unreasonable" and claimed that the Home Office had reneged on an assurance that the deposit box incident was not relevant to his application. He also claimed that his role in the cash-for-questions scandal had not been criticised in the official report on the affair.

No scandal, says Fayed, page 5

The grand delusion,

Review, front

Leading article,

Review, page 3

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in