EXPLAINER: Will ex-officer on trial for Floyd death testify?
A decision looms for a former police officer about whether to speak to jurors directly at his trial for murder and manslaughter in George Floyd’s death
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Now that prosecutors have wrapped up their case against a former Minneapolis police officer in George Floyd’s death, Derek Chauvin and his legal team must make a decision about whether he'll testify.
Doing so could help humanize Chauvin to jurors who haven't heard from him directly at trial, but it also would open him to what could be devastating cross-examination.
Chauvin is charged with second- and third-degree murder and manslaughter. Here's a look at some of the perils — and possible benefits — in Chauvin taking the stand:
WHY MIGHT CHAUVIN WANT TO TESTIFY?
Images from bystander video of Chauvin pinning Floyd to the pavement, his face impassive, have been played nearly every day at trial and are likely seared into the minds of many jurors.
The face mask Chauvin has been required to wear in court because of the pandemic has hidden any possible display of emotion by him during testimony. Taking the stand might be the only way for him to explain the video and show another side of himself.
“He has nothing to lose, given that that video is so damaging,” said Phil Turner, a former federal prosecutor in Chicago “You’ve got to get up there and give an explanation. It’s a no-brainer. You have to.”
Multiple witnesses and video evidence have shown Chauvin pinning Floyd for almost 9 1/2 minutes, well beyond the time Floyd stopped moving and a fellow officer said he could not find a pulse.
Turner said Chauvin has to “change the narrative” any way he can, even if the goal is not to secure outright acquittal on all counts but to stave off convictions on the most serious charges.
“What you are playing for is to get out of the murder charge,” he said. “If you do, you’ve won.”
COULD TESTIFYING HURT CHAUVIN'S CASE?
Definitely. Answering sympathetic questions from his own lawyer shouldn't be a problem. But cross-examination could be treacherous.
“They would be salivating to get him on the stand,” Minnesota defense attorney Mike Brandt said of prosecutors. “They’d have a field day with Chauvin.”
Brandt said prosecutors would likely play the bystander video of Chauvin, who is white, pinning Floyd — a Black man — and pausing it every few seconds to ask why he stayed on Floyd.
“They could ask Chauvin over and over, ‘Now is Floyd a threat here? OK, his eyes are closed. His body went limp. Is he a threat there?‘” said Brandt. He added: “Can you imagine how powerful that will be?”
If Chauvin can't offer plausible answers or insults jurors' intelligence, he could increase his chances of conviction on all counts, Brandt said.
IS CHAUVIN LIKABLE ENOUGH TO TESTIFY?
Most lawyers want to be sure jurors will like their clients before putting them on the stand, Brandt said, adding that nothing he has seem from Chauvin suggests he would come off as sympathetic.
“Chauvin doesn’t come across as a warm and pleasant person. And jurors want to see a caring and empathetic person. That is the one big liability: If jurors don’t like Chauvin, his fate is sealed.”
Chicago-based attorney Steve Greenberg agreed. If Chauvin rubs jurors the wrong way, it could backfire, said Greenberg.
“You run the risk of jurors hating him even more if he testifies, and him going down on murder charges,” he said.
WHAT MIGHT CHAUVIN SAY IN HIS DEFENSE?
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that officers' actions that lead to a suspect’s death can be legal if the officers believed their lives were at risk — even if, in hindsight, they were wrong. And only Chauvin can speak to what he was thinking that day, making it all the more imperative that he testify, Turner said.
Chauvin might tell jurors he's not a doctor and couldn't have known Floyd was dying, said Turner. He could say he kept his knee on Floyd because, from his experience, he knew larger suspects were capable of breaking free and posing a threat.
His lawyers could try to get Chauvin to testify that he was worried about Floyd’s well-being that day. That could include highlighting the call for an ambulance. He also might claim he wasn't pressing hard, despite expert testimony that calculated half his body weight plus gear was on Floyd at least part of the time.
WHAT ARE THE ODDS HE WILL TESTIFY?
Brandt initially thought Chauvin would testify, but as the trial has progressed, he said he thinks defense attorney Eric Nelson will avoid calling him because of the risk. And he said Nelson likely believes he can raise enough reasonable doubt without putting his client on the stand.
Greenberg said lawyers at murder trials typically don’t want their clients to testify. In more than 100 murder trails at which he represented clients, fewer than 10 took the stand.
“When defendants do testify, it is usually a Hail Mary pass” by a desperate defense that believes it has slim chance of acquittal on any charges, Greenberg said.
WOULD JURORS WANT TO HEAR FROM CHAUVIN?
They probably would.
The judge will instruct them before they start deliberations that defendants have a right not to testify and that they shouldn’t consider any decision not to as proof of guilt.
But legal experts widely agree that many jurors, despite those standard instructions, interpret a defendant’s silence as evidence of guilt.
“They're human,” said Brandt. “Even if they know Chauvin doesn’t have to testify, in their minds they think, ’But yeah, we wanted to hear from him.'”
___
Follow Michael Tarm on Twitter at http://twitter.com/mtarm
___
Find AP’s full coverage of the death of George Floyd at: https://apnews.com/hub/death-of-george-floyd