Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Experts back Prescott on car curbs

Sarah Schaefer Political Reporter
Monday 09 August 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

JOHN PRESCOTT'S transport policies were boosted yesterday when experts backed his stance that traffic growth can be curbed without damaging local economies.

An influential committee said road-building may not always boost the surrounding economy, while traffic reduction policies could bring benefits.

The government-appointed Standing Advisory Committee on Trunk Road Assessment (Sactra) also said all major transport schemes should be subjected to an economic impact report.

The report was welcomed by the Government as supporting the emphasis on improving public transport. It also offered some solace to Mr Prescott, who has been accused of ignoring growing public impatience with Labour's transport record.

Eileen Mackay, the committee's chairman, said: "If the circumstances are right, it should be possible to reduce the rate of traffic growth without harming the economy. We are not saying that transport schemes are bad for local economies, but merely pointing out that some schemes are good while others may not be good."

Sactra, which is made up of academics, industrialists and transport leaders, is seen as an important body that can influence government policy. A 1994 Sactra report, which suggested that building more roads led to increased congestion, resulted in the Conservative government at the time cutting back on its roads programme.

Lord Macdonald, a minister for Transport, said the Government had made "a good start" on reappraising transport investment in its White Paper, and the report had built on that.

"The report addresses a wide range of issues," he said. "We need to consider each recommendation carefully, in consultation with colleagues, and expect to provide a detailed and formal response by the end of the year."

Lynn Sloman, assistant director of the environment group Transport 2000, said: "Setting higher tests for roadbuilding should sound the death knell for dinosaur road schemes that should never have seen the light of day.

"The report should also give the Government and local councils confidence to cut traffic, knowing that it will bring both economic and environmental benefits."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in