Eurotunnel criticised over blaze
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Eurotunnel criticised over blaze
Eurotunnel's handling of the Channel Tunnel fire last November is expected to be criticised in an official report today.
The Channel Tunnel Safety Authority document will examine Eurotunnel's response to the blaze on a freight shuttle train. Thirty lorry drivers needed hospital treatment after being trapped in a fume-filled compartment 12 miles out from the French coast.
Last month, in its own inquiry, Eurotunnel admitted there were "avoidable delays" in tackling the emergency on the night of 18 November. But it ruled out mechanical or system failure as a reason for the blaze which damaged a 600-metre section of tunnel.
Company chiefs announced a number of new safety measures, including smokehoods for passengers and crew; more fire suppression systems in the tunnel and new electronic devices to show precisely where a train has stopped.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments