End of the world is not nigh
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Jehovah's Witnesses may breathe a sigh of relief this week. For the end of the world failed to take place for the second time in 20 years.
A growing number of Christian academics believe that Christ was born in 4BC, making 1996, 2,000 years after his birth, the real millennial milestone. But those who agree with Archbishop James Usher, a 17th-century archbishop, who believed the world would endure for only 6,000 years, would probably have spent this Christmas cashing in their life insurance policies.
"Archbishop Usher used the Anno Mundi calendar, which was a popular way to mark time. According to this, Christ's birth was widely considered to have taken place in year 4000 of the world, which meant that it would have ended on Wednesday [1 January] at the latest," said Marina Benjamin, whose book on the social significance of millennia and other endings is published later this year. Jojo Moyes Leading article, Page 17
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments