Elite squad detective sues over `damaged hearing'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A former detective who was routinely "wired up" with a radio and earpiece during four years of elite squad secret surveillance on major criminals is suing her police employers, claiming the equipment damaged her hearing and forced her into early retirement.
Laura Dyer, 48, is claiming pounds 500,000 compensation against the Metropolitan Police, which employed her in the Serious and Organised Crime Squad and the Flying Squad, in the High Court in London.
Mrs Dyer, of Bishop's Stortford, Hertfordshire, told the High Court in London she would have carried on in the job she loved until completing 30 years' service in 2003, but for the presence of "the enemy" - the buzzing, crackling tinnitus in her ears. Now working part time in the training department of a firm of estate agents, she said the noises were present as she was giving evidence. She said she could not go swimming with her 11-year-old daughter because of the enhanced noises in her ears, and travelling on the Underground was a traumatic experience.
The police deny allegations that they negligently exposed Mrs Dyer to excessive noise and failed to guard against the potential risks of wearing a receiver earpiece over long periods. Mrs Dyer also claims that ear infections from which she suffered were due to the lack of proper sterilisation facilities and the exchange of earpieces among officers.
Her counsel, John Foy QC, told Mr Justice Garland the volume level of the speech received by the radio hidden in her handbag during undercover operations was too high - although experts in the case were divided on this.
The noise was made worse by extraneous factors such as vehicles, video channels and stray electro-magnetic fields, he said.
The case continues.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments