Elephants grew swimming trunks
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SCIENTISTS HAVE worked out how the elephant really got its trunk, almost a century after Rudyard Kipling suggested the prehensile snout was the result of a tug-of-war with a crocodile.
The elephant's long nose evolved as a snorkel for underwater breathing rather than an extra limb for grabbing food, the researchers suggest.
A study of elephant embryos has found that the world's largest land-based mammal once may have lived an aquatic existence and is probably more closely related to sea cows than to other animals.
Kipling's version, outlined in one of his Just So Stories, suggested that the trunk resulted from an encounter on the banks of the Limpopo river between a curious young elephant and a crocodile who "pulled and pulled and pulled" until the elephant's nose "grew longer and longer".
Zoologists at the University of Melbourne in Australia, however, have found that elephant embryos transiently develop special kidney cells that are needed for aquatic life.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments